Bivariate correlations were calculated
between TIMEv, TIMEm, TIME, SES, age, problem solving, self-care,
and self-esteem. Significant correlations were found between TIMEv,
TIMEm, TIME. In addition negative correlations were found between
SES and TIME, age and TIME as well as TIMEm., and self-esteem and
TIME as well as TIMEv. Self-care showed a positive correlation with
TIME and TIMEv. There was no correlation between the problem solving
scores and any of the exercise parameters (Table 4).
Table 4: Correlations between
age, TIME, TIMEv, TIMEm, age, SES, problem solving, self-care, and
self-esteem.
|
|
TIMEv |
TIME |
TIMEm |
AGE |
SES |
PC |
SC |
SE |
Cor |
TIMEv |
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TIME |
0.864**
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TIMEm |
0.139**
|
0.606**
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age |
-0.036
|
-0.069*
|
-0.091**
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
SES |
-0.069
|
-0.077*
|
-0.046
|
-0.071
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
PS |
-0.059
|
-0.062
|
-0.026
|
-0.055
|
0.135**
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
SC |
0.119**
|
0.108**
|
0.029
|
0.001
|
-0.018
|
-0.513**
|
1.000
|
|
|
SE |
-0.104**
|
-0.086*
|
-0.009
|
-0.208**
|
0.026
|
0.273**
|
-0.375**
|
1.00
|
Sig |
TIMEv |
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TIME |
0.000
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TIMEm |
0.000
|
0.000
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age |
0.281
|
0.042
|
0.007
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SES |
0.057
|
0.034
|
0.209
|
0.051
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
PS |
0.138
|
0.120
|
0.509
|
0.169
|
0.002
|
.
|
|
|
|
SC |
0.004
|
0.008
|
0.485
|
0.975
|
0.690
|
0.000
|
.
|
|
|
SE |
0.002
|
0.012
|
0.796
|
0.000
|
0.481
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
.
|
N |
TIMEv |
883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TIME |
883
|
883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TIMEm |
883
|
883
|
883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age |
878
|
878
|
878
|
878
|
|
|
|
|
|
SES |
751
|
751
|
751
|
748
|
751
|
|
|
|
|
PS |
627
|
627
|
627
|
624
|
539
|
627
|
|
|
|
SC |
599
|
599
|
599
|
595
|
509
|
475
|
599
|
|
|
SE |
862
|
862
|
862
|
857
|
731
|
619
|
589
|
862
|
PS=Problem
solving, SC=Self-care, SE=Self-esteem.
**
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
|
|
|