Progress of family medicine in Slovenia |
||
Conclusions
Slovene family medicine has travelled its journey as many others did. The approval process and recognition of the family medicine as a special profession within the medical profession and among family physicians themselves was long, relatively tough and exhausting, so the today success has not arrive by chance. We will be fostering further activities in research, education and quality development in family medicine, because these are visiting cards of every profession. References 1. Švab I. Primary health care reform in Slovenia: first results. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 141-4. 2. Lawters AG, Rozanski BS, Nizakowski R, Rys A. Using patient surveys to measure the quality of outpatient care in Krakow, Poland. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 1999; 11: 497-506. 3. Ezekiel EJ, Neveloff Dubler N. Preserving the physician-patient relationship in the era of managed care. JAMA 1995; 273: 323-9. 4. Kersnik J. Determinants of customer satisfaction with the health care system, with the possibility to choose a personal physician and with a family doctor in a transition country. Health Policy. 2001; 57: 155-64. 5. Košir T. Splošna medicina v Sloveniji. (Family medicine in Slovenia). Ljubljana: Združenje zdravnikov družinske medicine - SZD, 2001: 232. 6. Švab I. General practice in the curriculum in Slovenia. Med Educ 1998; 32: 85-88. |
7. Šorli J, Kersnik J. Quality in health care: a proposed national policy. Copenhagen: WHO, 1996. 8. Kersnik J. Developing national policy on quality in health care in Slovenia: Implications for general practice. Audit Trends 1996; 4: 151-4. 9. Kersnik J. Kakovost v splošni medicini. (Quality in family medicine.) Ljubljana: Združenje zdravnikov družinske medicine - SZD, 1998: 308. 10. Kersnik J. An evaluation of patient satisfaction with family practice care in Slovenia. Int J Qual Health Care 2000; 12: 143-7. 11. Grol R, Wensing M, on the behalf of EUROPEP group. Patients evaluate general/family practice: the EUROPEP instrument. Nijmegen, 2000:101.
|