Dr.Thaer Al-Momani,
MD*
* From department
of pediatrics, Princess Haya Hospital.
Dr.Thaer Al-Momani
Department of pediatrics- Aqaba, Jordan
Amman- Jordan 11910, PO Box 1834
E-mail:
thaer_mom@yahoo.com
|
ABSTRACT
Objective:
The aim of this study was to obtain
data about different types of organisms
and their respective frequencies causing
urinary tract infection among children
presenting to princess Haya hospital
in the south of Jordan.
Patients and Methods: Urinary
specimens were collected from one
hundred patients, ages 0-15 years
of age suffering from urinary tract
infections, who were either inpatients
or outpatients. A urine culture and
colony count was performed combined
with a full report of urine to establish
the diagnosis.
Results: The data shows that
the majority of bacterial urinary
infections were in the 1-5 year-old
age group (49%) and the lowest in
the 0-1 year-old age group (5%); the
number of the patients was less in
the neonatal period and the cases
increased with the increasing age
and declined after the thirteen years
of age till fifteen years. E.coil
accounted for the vast majority of
infections (72%), while Klebsiella
pneumonia was isolated in 14%, Proteus
species (9%), Staphylococcus (4%)
and Pseudomonas in (1%).
Conclusion: The diagnosis of
UTI in young children is important
as it is a marker for urinary tract
abnormalities.
A child with a suspected UTI should
have a urine culture and colony count
performed in order to identify organisms
for confirmation of diagnosis and
recommend prompt treatment to reduce
UTI related morbidity and mortality
in children.
Key words:
urine culture, Urinary tract infections,
pathogens
|
Urinary tract infections (UTIs)
represent the commonest genitourinary disease
in children, and are the second commonest
infection, which affects them1. Urinary
tract infections in children are particularly
important because their occurrence may be
associated with some congenital abnormality
of the urinary tract or an error in management.
If not corrected, these may lead to recurrent
infections causing damage to the urinary
tract1,2.
Urinary tract infections occur in as many
as 5 percent of girls and 1 to 2 percent
of boys.3 The incidence of UTI in infants
ranges from approximately 0.1 to 1.0 percent
in all newborn infants to as high as 10
percent in low-birth-weight infants.4 Infection
of the urinary tract before age one occurs
more frequently in boys than in girls.4
After age one, both bacteriuria and UTI
are more common in girls.
In preschool-age children, the prevalence
of asymptomatic infections diagnosed by
suprapubic aspiration in girls is 0.8 percent,
compared with 0.2 percent in boys.5 In the
school-age group, the incidence of bacteriuria
among girls is 30 times that among boys
(1.2 versus 0.04 percent).6
Approximately half of girls and two thirds
of boys experience high fever with these
infections. In fact, UTIs have recently
been described as one of the most common
serious bacterial illnesses among febrile
infants and young children with a reported
prevalence ranging from 4.1% to 7.5%. These
figures suggest that the true frequency
of UTIs in children have been underestimated
in the past7. It is more common in the uncircumcised
male infant.
Infection may occur at many places along
the genitourinary tract: urethra, bladder,
ureter, renal pelvis, or renal parenchyma.1,8
It is assumed that the short urethra in
girls predisposes them to ascending infection,
because, for example Escherichia coli serotypes
from bowel flora are the same as those that
infect the urinary tract. However, factors
other than the proximity of gut flora to
the short urethra are likely because the
female to male ratio in urinary tract infection
varies directly with age 1,9.
Most infections are due to colonic bacteria
and are due to invasion up the urethra.
Of these, E.coli is by far the most commonly
isolated organism, being responsible for
approximately 80% of UTIs7. E.coli has recognized
virulence factors which aid in the persistence
of bacteria in the urinary tract and induce
inflammation. Such factors include the presence
of pili or fimbriae, K antigen in bacterial
capsule, haemolysin and colicin production
and the ability to acquire iron etc7.
Microbiologically, urinary tract infection
exists when pathogenic microorganisms are
detected in the urinary tract 6,10. The infection
is considered significant and requires treatment
when more than 105 microorganisms per milliliter
of urine are present in a properly collected
specimen.6,10 Gram-negative bacteria such
as E. coli, Proteus spp., Klebsiella spp.,
Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas
spp. are usually detected in recurrent infections,
especially in association with stones, obstruction,
urologic manipulation and nosocomial catheter-associated
infections. 2,6,11
The aim of this study was to obtain data
about different types of organisms and their
respective frequencies causing urinary tract
infection in children.
The sample of this study
was conducted in the Department of Pediatrics,
Princess Haya hospital (Aqaba- south of
Jordan).
After institutional ethical committee clearance
and written informed consent, urinary specimens
were collected from one hundred patients,
ages 0-15 years of age, suffering from urinary
tract infections, who were either inpatients
or outpatients.
The majority of patients were self-referrals,
while others were referred by general practitioners.
They presented with a variety of complaints
and if a urinary tract infection was suspected,
a urine culture and colony count was performed,
combined with a full report of urine to
establish the diagnosis.
|
|
Of the one hundred children,
41% were males and 59% were females.
A detailed history was
taken and complete clinical examination
was carried out for each case of urinary
tract infection. Every patient had urine
microscopy, ultrasound of kidneys and urinary
bladder, urinary colony count and urine
culture investigations.
A diagnosis of a UTI
was made when the colony count was over
105 organisms/ml and microscopic finding
of more than 5 white blood cells per high
power field on urine microscopy. A patient
with UTI may not have leucocytes in the
urine; leucocytes may be found in urine
in the absence of UTI eg. Acute glomerulonephritis.
The amount of leucocytes found in urine
would be determined by the speed and time
of centrifugation and the depth from which
the deposit is taken. In an uncentrifuged
sample of urine the detection of >10
leucocytes per mm3 is thought to be
significant12.
In Neonates the urine was collected through
supra pubic approach. In uncooperative and
moribund patients the urine was also collected
through the supra pubic puncture or urinary
catheterization. In infants and older children
the urine was collected in urine collecting
bag or sterilized container, after washing
the genital region with soap and water.
Mid stream, clean catch, early morning specimens
were collected in a sterilised container.
Instructions were given to transfer the
urine from the bag to the culture bottle
soon after collection. All urine cultures
at the time of initial diagnosis were collected
after stopping antibiotics for at least
72 hours. Urine sample was delivered to
the laboratory within 1 hour of collection.
Urine specimens that were not examined within
six hours of collection were stored at +4
°C, because at 0-4 °C the bacterial
count will remain unchanged for 24-48 hours
13. About 5ml of urine was centrifuged,
the super-natants tipped off and the deposit
resuspended in the urine that drained back
(about 0.1ml). A wet film of the suspension
was examined microscopically with the ´40
and the ´100 objectives. More than
two or three white cells per field with
the ´100 objective were regarded as
abnormal. The presence of any red cells
was regarded as abnormal 13.
For bacteriological
examination, the urine samples were cultured
in 5% sheep blood agar and MacConkey's media.
Inoculation was done with the help of a
0.001ml caliber loop. All the sample plates
were incubated for 48 hrs at 37oC in 5-10%
carbon dioxide for anaerobic growth. Bacterial
identification was done by examination of
the overnight culture with a hand lens and
also by a standard biochemical and sensitivity
test to antibiotics using a disk diffusion
method (Kirby-Bauer) 13. All cultures were
performed in one laboratory and by a consultant
microbiologist. If the growth revealed more
than one type of organism the culture was
repeated. Colony counts of <104 organisms/ml
were disregarded; counts between 104 to
105 organisms/ml were repeated.
There were
41(41%) boys and 59(59%) girls giving a
total of 100 patients. The data shows that
the majority of bacterial urinary infections
were in the 1-5 year-old age group (49%)
and the lowest in the 0-1 year-old age group
(5%); the number of patients was less in
the neonatal period and the cases increased
with increasing age and declined after thirteen
years of age till fifteen years. There were
more boys in the under 1 year age group
and more girls in the older age group. Pathogens
isolated in different age groups are given
in Table I.
The pathogens isolated at initial diagnosis
are given in Table II.
E.coli accounted for the vast majority of
infections (72%), while Klebsiella pneumonia
was isolated in 14%, Proteus species (9%),
Staphylococcus (4%) and Pseudomonas in (1%).
Urinary tract infection
in children is a significant source of morbidity.
It is generally agreed that children with
UTI require further investigation and continuing
urinary surveillance to minimize future
complications. 14
Although the drug treatment
of urinary tract infection is simple, the
disease is still largely misdiagnosed and
mismanaged. Studies have shown that the
early phase of tissue invasion by micro-organisms
is the critical determinant in the pathogenesis
of kidney lesions following urinary tract
infection and therefore early diagnosis
with prompt and effective antimicrobial
therapy for acute renal infection will prevent
or significantly inhibit the development
of renal damage. 15
The only reliable method
for precise diagnosis of UTI is the demonstration
of bacteria by appropriate culture methods.
Bacterial counts greater than 105 organisms
/ ml in urine samples and pure growth of
a single type of organism is found in the
majority of cases. Escherichia coli is the
commonest organism infecting the urinary
tract. Others include Klebsiella sp., Enterobacter
sp., Serratia sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa
and other Pseudomonas sp., Enterococci,
Staph.saprophytics, S.aureus, S.epidermidis,
Acinetobacter sp., B haemolytic streptococci
group B&D, Candida albicans, Salmonella
sp., and Mycobacteria.
In our study the organisms
infecting the urinary tract were E.coli
(72%), Klebsiella pneumonia (14%), Proteus
species (9%), Staphylococcus (4%), Pseudomonas
(1%). These results are similar to many
recent published articles.16, 17
Several studies in children
above one year of age till fifteen years
reported female predominance, with a variable
ratio ranging from 6:1 to 1.33:1, depending
upon the different sample size, and difference
in age groups being studied.16-20
In the present study Most of the infections
were observed in the female patients with
an overall male to female ratio of 1:1.4.
Males outnumbered females during the first
year of life with a ratio of 1.5:1; this
is in full agreement with other studies.21-24
The diagnosis of UTI
in young children is important as it is
a marker for urinary tract abnormalities.
A child with a suspected
UTI should have a urine culture and colony
count performed in order to identify organisms
for confirmation of diagnosis and recommend
prompt treatment to reduce UTI related morbidity
and mortality in children.
|
1. |
Feld
LG, Greenfield SP, Ogra PL.Urinary tract
infections in infants and children.
Pediatrics review, 1989, 11(3):71-7. |
2. |
Naylor
GR. A 16-month analysis of urinary tract
infection in children. Journal of medical
microbiology, 1984, 17(1):31-6. |
3. |
Zelikovic
I, Adelman RD, Nancarrow PA. Urinary
tract infections in children. An update.
West J Med 1992;157:554-61. |
4. |
Klein
JO, Long SS. Bacterial infections of
the urinary tract. In: Remington JS,
Klein JO, eds. Infectious diseases of
the fetus and newborn infant. 4th ed.
Philadelphia: Saunders, 1995:925-34. |
5. |
Feld
LG. Urinary tract infections in childhood:
definition, pathogenesis, diagnosis,
and management. Pharmacotherapy 1991;11:326-35. |
6. |
Travis
LB, Brouhard BH. Infections of the urinary
tract. In: Rudolph AM, ed. Rudolph's
Pediatrics. 20th ed. Stanford, Conn.:
Appleton & Lange, 1996:1388-92. |
7. |
Rushton
HG. Urinary Tract Infections in Children.
Pediatric Clinics of North America 1997;
44: 1133-1169. |
8. |
Behrman
and Vaughan. Nelson textbook of pediatrics,
Vol 2 Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company,
1989. |
9. |
Jodal
U, Winberg J. Management of children
with unobstructed urinary tract infection.
Pediatric nephrology, 1987, 129(1):647-56 |
10. |
Tolkoff
NE, Rubin RH. Urinary tract infection.
Significance and management. Bulletin
of the New York Academy of Medicine,
1986, 62(2):131-48. |
11. |
Warren
JW. Catheter-associated urinary tract
infections. Infectious disease clinics
of North America, 1987, 1(4):823-54. |
12. |
Hoberman
A,Wald E.R.,Reynolds E.A.,et al; Is
urine culture necessary to rule out
urinary tract infection in young febrile
children? Paediatric Infectious Diseases
Journal 1996; 15: 304 -9. |
|
|
13. |
Baron
EJ, Finegold SM. Diagnostic microbiology.
Textbook for the isolation and identification
of pathogenic organisms, 8th ed. St.
Louis, Mosby-Year Book Inc., 1990. |
14. |
Vernon
SJ, Coulthard MG, Lambert H, Keir MJ,
Mathews JN. New renal scarring in children
who at the age of 3 and 4 years had
had normal scan with dimercaptosuccinic
acid, follow-up study. BMJ 1997; 315:905-908. |
15. |
Miller
T, Phillips S. Pyelonephritis: the relationship
between infection, renal scarring, and
antimicrobial therapy. Kidney Int 1981;
19:654-62. |
16. |
Arslan
S, Caksen H, Rastgeldi L, Uner A, Oner
AF, Odabas D. Use of urinary gram stain
for the detection of urinary tract infection
in childhood. Yale Journal of Biology
and Medicine 2002;75:73-8. |
17. |
Waisman
Y, Zerem E, Amir L, Mimouni M. The Validity
of the Uriscreen Test for Early Detection
of Urinary Tract Infection in Children.
Pediatrics 1999;104(4):p.e41. |
18. |
Langley
JM, Hanakowski M, Leblanc JC. Unique
epidemiology of nasocomial urinary tract
infection in children. Am. J. Infect.
Control 2001;29:94-8. |
19. |
Wammanda
R.D., Ewa B.O. Urinary tract pathogens
and their sensitivity pattern in children.
Annals of Tropical Pediatrics 2002;22:197-8. |
20. |
Barnett
BJ, Stephens DS. Urinary tract infection:
an over view. Am J Med Sci 1997;314:245-9 |
21. |
Mobley
HL, Island MD, Massad G. Virulence determinants
of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli and
Proteus mirabilis. Kidney Int Suppl
1994;47: S129-S131. |
22. |
Jakobsson
B, Esbjorner E. Sverker H. Minimum Incidence
and Diagnostic Rate of First Urinary
Tract Infection - Statistical Data Included.Pediatrics
1999;104(2):2226. |
23. |
Gallager
SA, Hemphill RR. Urinary Tract Infections:
Epidemiology, Detection, and Evaluation.
[Cited on 2003]. Available from: www.ahcpub.com. |
24. |
Hellerstein
S. Urinary tract infection in children:
why they occur and how to prevent them.
Am Fam Physician 1998; 46(2):2440-51. |
|