Recai OGUR,
MD * (1)
Ahmet KORKMAZ, MD (2)
Bilal BAKIR, MD (1)
(1) Gulhane
Military Medical Academy, Department
of Public Health, Ankara, Turkey
(2) Gulhane Military Medical Academy,
Department of Physiology, Ankara,
Turkey
Recai
OGUR, MD
GATA Halk Sagligi AD
06018, Etlik, Ankara
Turkey
Email: recaiogur@yahoo.com,
Email: rogur@gata.edu.tr
Tel: +90.312.3044671
Fax: +90.312.3046150
|
ABSTRACT
Alternative treatment
usage is increasing around the world
although treatment methods are becoming
more modern and more drugs are made
available. Related to these global
changes we aimed to determine the
incidence of treatment with herbs,
an alternative treatment method, in
Turkey and the reasons for its usage.
The study was carried out with a questionnaire
on the Internet which 19,022 persons
who had received preliminary information,
completed. After the subjects were
informed of the study, the analysis
of medicinal plants by the participants
between January 1, 2004 and December
31, 2004, at the web site where they
completed the questionnaire was recorded
and evaluated. 75.9% of those participating
in the study reported that they had
used a herbal medication at least
once. The main health problems leading
to the usage of herbal medication
for their treatment was hair loss
- hair care, hemorrhoids, skin care,
peptic ulcer - gastritis and infertility.
The plants the participants were most
interested in were nettle, St. John's
wort, rosemary, garden sage and hawthorn.
The main reason for interest in herbal
treatments was "hoping to find
a herbal medicine which could help
treat their condition". Nettle,
oleander and thyme were the plants
most commonly used to treat cancer
patients. Turkey has a higher rate
of alternative medicine usage than
other countries where similar studies
have been conducted and comprehensive
and regular studies are required to
show changes over time.
Key Words:
herbal medicine, alternative therapies,
traditional medicine
|
Alternative treatment methods
have been used for the treatment of disease
and to improve health for hundreds of years.
Studies on the incidence of alternative
treatment usage in the community have shown
a constantly increasing rate [1].
It is reported that 42.1% of the U.S. population
use alternative treatment method. The cost
of alternative treatment has been calculated
as USD 22.6 billion for 1990, increasing
to USD 32.7 billion for 1997 [2].
Another study from the same country has
revealed that 33.8% of the people spend
more on alternative treatment methods than
they do on conventional treatment methods
[3]. The rate of having used
an alternative treatment method at least
once is 48% in Australia, 70% in Canada,
38% in Belgium, 90% in Germany and 75% in
France [4]. While there are no
comprehensive studies to show the rate of
alternative treatment usage in Turkey generally,
some local studies in treatment centers,
mostly concerned with chronic disease, have
shown that alternative treatments are used
by a high percentage of the patients. For
example, studies on cancer patients have
shown alternative treatment usage rates
of 41.1%, 50.0% and 61.0% [5, 6, 7].
Plants were the most commonly used alternative
treatment method in all three studies. Another
study with allergic patients has shown that
38.0% use alternative treatment methods,
usually with plants [8].
Although modern treatment methods are being
developed rapidly and many new drugs are
produced, patients seem to use alternative
treatment methods at an increasing rate
[2, 4]. The main reasons for
this tendency are: (a) dissatisfaction with
the results obtained from health carers
and related institutions, (b) discomfort
because of the side effects of drugs and
other treatment methods, (c) financial cost
of the treatment (especially medication)
and care services, (d) not having a say
in their health status and their treatment
and (e) treatment that is technological
and not individualized [9, 10].
However, not being able to access health
care should also be seen as an important
factor for the usage of alternative treatment
methods, especially in developing countries.
For example, the percentage of those who
are not able to access health care and use
alternative treatments is about 80% in Africa
[4]. Another aspect of alternative
medicine methods is that they have cultural
and traditional properties. Some alternative
treatment methods may therefore be kept
locally and the usage rates found by studies
may be much lower than the actual rate [2,
4].
The preferred alternative treatment method
changes from country to country. While acupuncture
is used commonly across the world [4,
11], the most commonly used alternative
treatment methods in the U.S.A. and Canada
are massage, chiropractic manipulation,
vitamin-mineral support and acupuncture
[3, 12, 13]. Studies from Turkey
have shown that herbal medicine usage is
more common as an alternative treatment
method [5, 6, 7, 8]. We therefore
aimed to determine the rate of herbal medicine
usage in Turkey and why and how it was used.
The
study was carried out between January 1,
2004 and December 31, 2004. A total of 19,022
people were informed by e-mail at the beginning
and invited to participate in the study.
The e-mail had concise information on the
study and the subjects were asked to visit
the internet address containing the questionnaire
and complete the form. The Internet Protocol
(IP) numbers of those visiting the internet
address were logged to prevent the same
person from completing more than one questionnaire.
The participants were asked their preferred
herbal treatment methods, any herbal treatment
methods for cancer treatment they knew of
or had heard of, and their age and sex.
The results of participants under 18 were
not recorded and not included in the study.
The study is of the descriptive type and
MS Access software and SPSS for Windows
version 11.0 was used to evaluate the results.
The questions included in the questionnaire
are shown in Table 1.
13,025 of the 19,022 study
subjects answered the questionnaire but
3.132 responded that they had never used
herbal treatment methods and did not continue
with the other sections. As a result, the
completed questionnaires of 9,893 subjects
were considered valid and included in the
study. This shows that 75.9% of the participants
had used a herbal treatment method at least
once.
48.4% of the participants were female and
51.6% male with an average age of 31.3 ±
9.1 (30.6 ± 8.8 for the females and
32.0 ± 9.5 for the males). We had
participants from all 81 Turkish provinces.
Most participants were from Istanbul, Ankara
or Izmir (17.5%, 13.7% and 10.9% respectively).
|
|
The
9,893 persons successfully completing the
questionnaire also recorded their primary
concerns about medical herbs and medical conditions
which they look for herbal treatment. Associated
or similar conditions or health problems that
the participants obtained information on were
grouped. The conditions/health problems the
participants were most interested in were
hair loss and hair care, hemorrhoids, skin
care, peptic ulcer - gastritis and infertility
(Table 2). The medicinal
plants the participants were most interested
in were nettle, St. John's wort, rosemary,
garden sage and hawthorn (Table
3).
2,948 participants answered the question "What
herbal treatment methods are used in your
community for treatment of cancer?".
The ten plants used most frequently in the
community for cancer treatment were (in order
of reported frequency) nettle, oleander, thyme,
flaxseed, garlic, mint, cabbage, fennel, dog
rose and mistletoe. Nettle was reported by
44.9% of those responding to this question.
The participants were asked why they were
interested in herbal treatment methods and
the most common answer with 32.6% was that
they hoped it would help the treatment of
themselves or someone they knew. Using herbal
treatment for financial reasons was the least
frequent answer at 3.8%. It was interesting
that 26.9% of the participants stated that
they did not have a health problem at the
moment and were interested in herbal treatment
only because they were curious about the subject.
Of the 19,022 subjects
sent information on the study, 13025 (68.4%)
were willing to participate. 75.9% of the
participants reported that they had used
a herbal treatment method at least once.
When we take into consideration that the
main conditions for participating in the
study were to have an email address and
to be able to access the Internet, the participants
would be expected to have a high socioeconomic
status level and to not reflect the country
population in general. However the following
led us to believe it is possible to project
the group's results to the general community:
the ages of the subjects that were sent
emails varied widely (18-83 years), members
and participants were present from every
province of the country and the sex distribution
was balanced (48.4% males and 51.6% females).
The web site which accepted members had
various sections (history, entertainment,
general culture, news, etc.) in addition
to health and medicinal plants and this
also made it possible to obtain information
from the general community. We can therefore
say that 75.9% of Turkish people over 18
years of age have used a herbal medication
at least once according to this study.
When we compare our results with those from
other countries, it is seen that the percentage
of those who have used a herbal medication
at least once in Turkey is higher than the
rate of alternative treatment usage in countries
such as the U.S.A., Australia, Canada, Belgium
and France [2, 4]. The studies
carried out in the above countries have
determined the rate of usage for all alternative
treatment methods and this rate is therefore
much higher in Turkey.
Although studies on the frequency of alternative
treatment usage in Turkey are usually interested
in the treatment of chronic disease such
as cancer [5, 6, 7] and allergies [8] our
results indicate that the most common condition
for which information was obtained over
the year for herbal treatment was hair loss
and hair care (5.4%). It may therefore be
stated that most of the community is interested
in using herbal medication for cosmetic
reasons. The main reasons for this may be
the emphasis placed on herbal/natural additives
in advertisements, the high cost of cosmetic
applications, and the common interest in
cosmetic applications by rich and poor alike.
Hemorrhoids were second in the list of the
diseases gathering the most interest with
4.1% and this could be due to a reluctance
to be examined. Table 2
shows that only 1.06% of the subjects
accessed during the year were related to
cancer and other associated conditions.
The community seems to be using herbal treatments
more for cosmetic reasons and for conditions
that could generally be prevented with preventive
measures than chronic medical conditions
that currently have a high mortality. The
most accessed health-related subjects, shown
in Table 2, provide
information on both herbal treatments and
the general condition of the society. The
fact that complaints related to peptic ulcer,
gastritis and other similar problems were
placed third may be an indication of the
preference for spicy, hard-to-digest food
containing lots of fat in many parts of
the country. Health problems such as infection
and high fever and more serious conditions
requiring urgent treatment such as myocardial
infarction and angina, were not investigated
by the participants and this is a positive
indication of the community's approach to
health-related matters.
Nettle was the medicinal plant investigated
most often by the participants throughout
the year (Table 3).
Nettle is also prominent worldwide among
the medicinal plants: it has been shown
to be the alternative treatment method used
most often by cancer patients in Turkey
[5, 7], it is consumed as food in many parts
of the country [14] and it has been used
in many parts of the world to treat conditions
such as arthritis, anemia, asthma, diabetes
mellitus, hypertension, hemorrhoids, heavy
menstrual bleeding, gout, neuralgia, prostate
hypertrophy and hair loss [15, 16, 17].
Research has also shown that it has an inducing
effect on T-lymphocytes [18, 19]. It will
be beneficial to investigate all of these
properties of nettle in a comprehensive
manner, combine scientifically valid information
on its efficacy and usage, to convert the
plant into medicinal form if appropriate
and enable modern medicine to take advantage
of its properties. Other plants frequently
investigated by the participants during
our study were also plants investigated
and used widely worldwide (Table
3) [15, 16, 17].
We thought early in the study that the main
reason for using medicinal plants would
be chronic diseases with a high mortality
rate such as cancer and asked participants
"What herbal treatment methods, if
any, are used in your community for cancer
treatment?" and 2,984 participants
responded. 44.9% of those answering this
questions stated that nettle was used for
cancer treatment in their community. Most
plants used for cancer treatment were generally
well-known and studied plants (Table
4). However some (seven) participants
from Southern Turkey stated that the myrtle
plant was also used for cancer treatment
in their community. This plant has generally
been studied in relation to diabetes mellitus
treatment [20] and we did not find any note
on its anticancerogenic effect on MEDLINE.
When the participants were asked why they
were interested in herbal treatment methods,
32.6% answered that they were hoping they
would help the treatment of themselves or
someone they knew (Table
4). However, other studies have
shown discontent with the healthcare service
received as the top reason [9, 10]. While
financial difficulties were one of the main
reasons for preferring alternative treatment
methods in previous studies, they were last
among the reasons in our study. The option
'I am not ill but I am interested in herbal
drugs to live better', not present in previous
studies, was selected by more than 20% of
the participants and may indicate that people
want to decide how to improve their health.
Although it is commonly believed that most
current drugs are synthetic in origin, six
of the 20 most commonly prescribed drugs
in 1996 were natural products and 50% of
these 20 drugs were associated with natural
ingredients, showing the importance of herbal
products in drug production and usage [21].
Although herbal drugs are investigated extensively,
especially for the treatment of cancer,
viral disease and infertility, inadequate
information is being released due to the
intense competition in the drug industry
[21]. Comprehensive studies on the community
usage of drugs are therefore extremely important
and should be repeated often and with a
wider scope.
In conclusion, Turkey
has a higher rate of alternative medicine
usage compared to other countries where
similar studies have been conducted and
comprehensive and regular studies are required
to show changes over time. Scientific and
academic institutions should take the initiative
to prepare comprehensive sources of scientific
information on the Internet, one of the
easiest ways to access information, in the
country's own language to prevent the community
from obtaining false information on alternative
treatment methods and medicinal plants and
being misdirected.
|
1. |
Blackmer
J, Jefromova L. The use of alternative
therapies in the Saskatchewan stroke
rehabilitation population. BMC Complement
Altern Med. 2002; 2(1): 7. |
2. |
Cuellar
N, Aycock T, Cahil B, Ford J. Complementary
and alternative medicine (CAM) use by
african american (AA) and caucasian
american (CA) older adults in a rural
setting: a descriptive, comparative
study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2003;
3(1): 8. |
3. |
Eisenberg
DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock FE,
Calkins DR, Delbanco TL. Unconventional
medicine in the United States. Prevalence,
costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J
Med. 1993; 328(4): 246-52. |
4. |
WHO.
WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2002-2005.
WHO/EDM/TRM/2002.1. Geneva. 2002. |
5. |
Gozum
S, Tezel A, Koc M. Complementary alternative
treatments used by patients with cancer
in eastern Turkey. Cancer Nurs. 2003;
26(3): 230-6. |
6. |
Ceylan
S, Hamzaoglu O, Komurcu S, Beyan C,
Yalcin A. Survey of the use of complementary
and alternative medicine among Turkish
cancer patients. Complement Ther Med.
2002; 10(2): 94-9. |
7. |
Samur
M, Bozcuk HS, Kara A, Savas B. Factors
associated with utilization of nonproven
cancer therapies in Turkey. A study
of 135 patients from a single center.
Support Care Cancer. 2001; 9(6): 452-8.
|
8. |
Kurt
E, Bavbek S, Pasaoglu G, Abadoglu O,
Misirligil Z. Use of alternative medicines
by allergic patients in Turkey. Allergol
Immunopathol (Madr). 2004; 32(5): 289-94. |
9. |
Snyder
M and Lindquist R. Issues in complementary
therapies: how we got to where we are.
Online Journal of Issues in Nursing.
2001; 6: 1. |
10. |
Astin
JA: Why patients use alternative medicine:
results of a national study. JAMA. 1998,
279: 1548-1553. |
11. |
Ko
GD, Berbrayer D. Complementary and alternative
medicine: Canadian psychiatrists' attitudes
and behavior. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
2000; 81(5): 662-7. |
|
|
12. |
Elder
NC, Gillcrist A, Minz R. Use of alternative
health care by family practice patients.
Arch Fam Med. 1997; 6: 181-184. |
13. |
Paramore
LC. Use of alternative therapies: estimates
from the 1994 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
National Access to Care Survey. J Pain
Symptom Manage. 1997; 13(2): 83-9. |
14. |
Esiyok
D, Otles S, Akcicek E. Herbs as a food
source in Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer
Prev. 2004; 5(3): 334-9. |
15. |
Launert
E. Edible and Medicinal Plants. Hamlyn
1981 |
16. |
Bown
D. Encyclopaedia of Herbs and their
Uses. Dorling Kindersley, London. 1995 |
17. |
Chevallier
A. The Encyclopedia of Medicinal Plants.
Dorling Kindersley, London 1996. |
18. |
Le
Moal MA, Truffa-Bachi P. Urtica dioica
agglutinin, a new mitogen for murine
T lymphocytes: unaltered interleukin-1
production but late interleukin 2-mediated
proliferation. Cell Immunol. 1988 Aug;
115(1): 24-35. |
19. |
Le
Moal MA, Colle JH, Galelli A, Truffa-Bachi
P. Mouse T-lymphocyte activation by
Urtica dioica agglutinin. I. - Delineation
of two lymphocyte subsets. Res Immunol.
1992; 143(7): 691-700. |
20. |
Elfellah
MS, Akhter MH, Khan MT. Anti-hyperglycaemic
effect of an extract of Myrtus communis
in streptozocin-induced diabetes in
mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 1984; 11(3):
275-81. |
21. |
Phillipson
JD. Phytochemistry and medicinal plants.
Phytochemistry. 2001; 56(3): 237-43. |
|