Is
voiding cystourethrogram necessary in a febrile infant
with normal renal ultrasound?
|
Authors
Fahad Alanezi, Mohammad Otaibi, Khalid Abdualgani
Department of Ppediatric
Al-Jahra Hospital, Kuwait
Correspondence:
DR fahad alanezi FRCP,FAAP,MD
NEPHROLOGIST, AlJAHRA Hospital,
Department of pediatric, Kuwait
Tel: 4575300(5358)
Fax: 4576805
Mob: 9846919
Pager: 9170325
Email: fdh529@hotmail.com
Abstract
Aims: To determine the sensitivity, specificity,
and predictive values of renal ultrasound findings for vesicouretral
reflux (VUR) in febrile infant with urinary tract infection.
Patients and Methods: Retrospective review of the ultrasound and voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) results of 42 infants under 3 months of age admitted with their first episode of urinary tract infection (UTI) over 18 months period. Ultrasound findings were considered suggestive of VUR if 'dilatation of the pelvi-calyces', 'dilatation of ureters" or "dilatation of the collecting system of one or both kidney" was reported.
Results: A total of 49 patients were eligible for inclusion (medium age 28 days, 30 (71%) were male). Forty-two patients met all inclusion criteria. Prevalence of VUR on VCUCs was 62 % (26/42). Sensitivity of ultrasound for detection of VUR was 62 %, specificity 62 %, positive predictive value = 73, Negative predictive value = 50 %.
Conclusion: Renal ultrasound findings are not sensitive and not specific for VUR in infant under 3 months of age with first UTI. So, VCUG is necessary in these infant even if renal ultrasound is normal.
Key words: urinary tract infection, vesicouretral reflux, fever,ureter
Introduction
The urinary tract is a relatively common site of infection
in infants and young children. Urinary tract infections
(UTI) are important because they cause acute morbidity and
may result in long term medical problems, including hypertension
and reduced renal function (1). The prevalence of UTI in
girls younger than 1 year of age is 6.5 %, in boys it is
3.3 % (2). Because urinary tract infection in infant cannot
be identified clinically, Renal ultrasound of such patients
may be warranted (3). The purpose of the Renal ultrasound
is to detect anatomical abnormalities of the urinary tract
systems as well as VUR. Because Renal U/S is safe, non-invasive
and inexpensive, physicians may be reassured by normal ultrasound
and not appreciative of performing VCUG which is the gold
standard test for the diagnosis of visecouretral reflux.
The objective of this study was to determine whether the
presence of a dilated collecting system of the Kidney and
urinary tract, as reported by Radiologist, predicted the
presence of VUR on VCUG.
Patients and Methods
All patient admitted to Al-Jahra Hospital from 1st January
2002 to 30th September 2003, with a discharge diagnosis
of urinary tract infection (UTI) were identified by retrospective
review of the medical records for urinary tract infection.
All the charts of all infant under 3 months of age admitted
with UTI defined as presence of a pure bacterial growth
> 100000 colony forming units//ml (4) were reviewed.
Infant with spinal cord abnormalities were excluded. At
Al-Jahra Hospital, the current protocol for urinary tract
infection in the department of pediatric requires that all
infants under 3 months of age admitted with culture proven
UTI be investigated with Ultrasound (u/s) and voiding cystourethrogram
(VCUG). The renal ultrasound is done at time of admission.
In this study, a renal U/S was considered suggestive of
VUR, if "a dilatation of the pelvi-calyces", "
Dilation of the ureter " or "dilatation of the
collecting system of one or both kidneys" was reported.
All VCUG were performed at Al-Jahra Hospital before or soon
after discharge. All patients were on prophylactics antibiotics,
pending their VCUG test results. All ultrasound and voiding
cystourethrogram(VCUG) studies were reviewed by a group
of five staff radiologists.
Descriptive statistics for the entire group included age,
sex and prevalence of VUR. The statistical indices used
to evaluate the properties of the diagnostic test were sensitivity,
specificity and predictive values (positive and negative)
when gold standard test exists (in this case, VCUG), sensitivity
was defined as the proportion of those with the disorder
(VUR) in whom the test (renal U/S) is a definitive, specificity
in the proportion of those without the disorder in whom
the test is negative. The positive predictive value in this
context is the probability of VUR in infant with dilatation
noted on the ultrasound scan; the negative predictive value
is the probability of no reflux in infant with no dilatation
noted in ultrasound. For all indices, 95% confidence interval
when calculated around the point estimates.
Results
A total of 49 charts of patients less than 3 months of age
with a discharge of UTI were identified. Three were excluded
because of presence of spinal cord anomalies. Four patients
who were booked for VCUG on out-patient, did not return
for their appointment, leaving 42 subjects with UTI who
had a VCUG performed. The median age of the 42 infants was
28 days; 30 (71%) were male. The median number of days between
start of treatment for UTI and ultrasonography was 4 days.
Twenty six patients were found to have VUR on VCUG, giving
prevalence of 62 %. Of these 26 patients, one had grade
I reflux, 3 had grade II reflux, 11 had grade III reflux
, eight had grade IV reflux, and 3 had grade V reflux. Ultrasound
result, suggested the presence of VUR in 16 of the 26 patients,
and in 6 of 16 patients without VUR on VCUG. Table-I shows
the distribution of the 26 patients with VUR on VCUG. The
sensitivity of ultrasound for detection of VUR was 62 %;
specificity was 62 %. The positive predictive value of ultrasound
for VUR was 73 % and the negative predictive value was 50%.
Discussion
This study shows that ultrasound findings are not predictive
of VUR on VCUG. Furthermore, some children with higher grade
VUR by VCUG were not detected by renal ultrasound including
8 infants with grade III and two with grade IV reflux. Our
review of literatures showed few similar studies examined
the reliability of ultrasonography in identification of
reflux Nephropathy in children. Stokland and colleagues
(5)-looked at older children (near age 2 years) who were
referred for renal ultrasound and VCUG for first episode
of UTI. Sherwood and colleagues (6) also found that ultrasound
was not sensitive for VUR.
The median age of the children in our study was 28 days
reflecting the group in pediatric population at risk of
invasive bacterial infections . Hoberman and colleagues
(7) investigated the prevalence of UTI among 945 febrile
infant , with and without an apparent source of fever. They
found fifty (3.3%) of the 945 febrile infant, had positive
culture.
Out study showed that boys are more susceptible to urinary tract infection than girls. This finding is similar to other studies (8), which showed that boys are more susceptible before the age of 3 months.
Our study, being retrospective in design, had some limitations. The number of our subjects was small compared to other studies, which showed similar results. All ultrasound and VCUG studies were reviewed by a group of five staff Radiologists. However, inter-rater reliability was not assessed. Because Radiologist reading the VCUG results, were not blinded to the ultrasound results, bias can not be excluded.
Conclusion
Renal Ultrasound findings are neither sensitive nor specific
for VUR. Therefore, physician should not use renal ultrasound
findings to influence the decision on whether or not to
proceed with a VCUG in the investigation even in infant
under three months of age.
ACKNOWLEGEMENTS
We acknowledge with thanks Ms Kunjamma for her secretarial help.
REFERENCES
1. | American academy of pediatrics:
Diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of the initial
urinary tract infection in febrile infants and young
children. Pediatric1999,103, 843-852. |
2. | Hoberman A, Chao HP, Keller DM, et al. Prevalence of urinary tract infection in febrile infants.J Pediatric 1993; 123 : 17-23. |
3. | Hoberman A, Charcon M, Wald E, et al : Imaging studies in the follow-up of children with first diagnosed urinary traction infection: what is needed? Pedatri Res 1996; 39 : 133A. |
4. | James Larcombe. Et al. UTI in children. BMJ 1994; 309 : 235-9 (23 July). |
5. | Stockland E, Hellstrom M, et al. Reliability of ultrasonography in identification of reflux nephropathy in children. BMJ 1999, 319; 1173-1175 (30th October). |
6. | Sherwood T, Whitaker RH. Initial screening of children with urinary tract infection : is plain film radiography and ultrasonography enough? BMJ 1984; 228 : 827. |
7. | Hoberman et al. UTI in young children : New light on old questions.Contemporary Pediatric, Nov. 1977. |
8. | Stock H. Urinary tract infection in girls: The cost-effectiveness of currently recommended investigation routines. Pediatric Nephro. 1997; 11:174-177. |
9. | Ginsberg on, Mc Cracker GH
Jr. Urinary tract infection in young infants.Pediatrics;
1982 : 69 : 409-412. |