|
|
............................................................. |
|
........................................................ |
From
the Editor |
|
Editorial
A. Abyad (Chief Editor) |
|
|
........................................................
|
Original
Contribution/Clinical Investigation
|
|
<-- Turkey -->
Very high
levels of C-reactive protein should alert the
clinician to the development of acute chest
syndrome in sickle cell patients
[pdf version]
Can Acipayam, Sadik Kaya, Mehmet Rami Helvaci,
Gül Ilhan, Gönül Oktay
<-- Jordan -->
Seroprevalence
of HBV, HCV, HIV and syphilis infections among
blood donors at Blood Bank of King Hussein Medical
Center: A 3 Year Study
[pdf
version]
Baheieh Al Abaddi, Maha Al Amr, Lamees Abasi,
Abeer Saleem, Nisreen Abu hazeem, Ahmd Marafi
|
........................................................ |
Medicine and Society
........................................................
International Health
Affairs
.......................................................
Education
and Training
.......................................................
Continuing
Medical Education
Chief
Editor -
Abdulrazak
Abyad
MD, MPH, MBA, AGSF, AFCHSE
.........................................................
Editorial
Office -
Abyad Medical Center & Middle East Longevity
Institute
Azmi Street, Abdo Center,
PO BOX 618
Tripoli, Lebanon
Phone: (961) 6-443684
Fax: (961) 6-443685
Email:
aabyad@cyberia.net.lb
.........................................................
Publisher
-
Lesley
Pocock
medi+WORLD International
11 Colston Avenue,
Sherbrooke 3789
AUSTRALIA
Phone: +61 (3) 9005 9847
Fax: +61 (3) 9012 5857
Email:
lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
.........................................................
Editorial
Enquiries -
abyad@cyberia.net.lb
.........................................................
Advertising
Enquiries -
lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
.........................................................
While all
efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy
of the information in this journal, opinions
expressed are those of the authors and do not
necessarily reflect the views of The Publishers,
Editor or the Editorial Board. The publishers,
Editor and Editorial Board cannot be held responsible
for errors or any consequences arising from
the use of information contained in this journal;
or the views and opinions expressed. Publication
of any advertisements does not constitute any
endorsement by the Publishers and Editors of
the product advertised.
The contents
of this journal are copyright. Apart from any
fair dealing for purposes of private study,
research, criticism or review, as permitted
under the Australian Copyright Act, no part
of this program may be reproduced without the
permission of the publisher.
|
|
|
August 2014 -
Volume 12 Issue 6 |
|
The
necessity and importance of writing and publishing
non-research papers
Mohsen Rezaeian
Correspondence:
Professor Mohsen Rezaeian
PhD, Epidemiologist
Social Medicine Department
Occupational Environmental Research Center
Rafsanjan Medical School
Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences
Rafsanjan-Iran
Tel:03915234003
Fax:03915225209
Email:
moeygmr2@yahoo.co.uk
Abstract
There
are some specific scientific articles
that we could categorize as non-research
papers. Some of the most common types
of such papers are: editorials, letters
to the editor, book reviews/film reviews,
case reports/case series, commentaries
and narrative reviews. The aim of the
present article is to discuss these diverse
types of non-research papers and their
importance.
Keywords: Non-research
papers, editorials, letters to the editor,
book reviews/film reviews, case reports/case
series, commentaries, narrative reviews
|
Scientific research articles are written by scientists
in order to communicate new knowledge in solving
problems, testing hypotheses and/or advance the
boundaries of human knowledge in diverse disciplines.
In quantitative research in the health domain
we could name such research articles as: cross-sectional,
ecological, case-control, cohort and trial studies.
However, there are also some other specific scientific
articles that we could categorize as non-research
papers. Some of the most common types of these
papers are: editorials, letters to the editor,
book reviews/film reviews, case reports/case series,
commentaries and narrative reviews. The aim of
the present article is to discuss these diverse
types of non-research papers and their importance.
Editorials
Editorials are often very useful and informative
non-research papers written by editors or solicited
by them. They usually cover important topics
of general interests of the readers, authors
and reviewers of a journal. They might also
convey the policy of the journal in reviewing
and publishing the submitted articles.
Letters to the editor
A letter to the editor seems to be the most
common type of non-research paper. Letters are
usually written by scientists in response and/or
reaction to one of the research papers i.e.
cross-sectional, ecological, case-control, cohort
and trial studies, which a journal has just
recently published. The fundamentals of letters
are to inform the authors of a research paper,
about a shortcoming and/or an overlooked issue
in their paper.
Letters are written to the chief editor of the
journal and if she/he finds the letter informative,
they refer it to the authors of the original
paper and ask for a reply. As soon as receiving
the proper reply, the chief editor might choose
to publish the letter and its reply in the next
available issue. Such communications between
scientists are vital and may help to correct
any possible mistakes in a published research
paper.
Book reviews/film reviews
Book reviews and film reviews are two other
essential non-research papers. Such papers are
usually written by experts in the field (critics)
on review of a recently published book or a
film production in a specific domain.
By focusing on the pros and cons of a book or
a film, these types of reviews would provide
authors of a book or producers of a film with
valuable feedback. Such feedback could establish
a firm ground for a new edition of the book
and a new version of the film.
Case reports/case series
Case reports deal with the reporting of a rare
clinical disease or a case with rare and unique
characteristics. Similarly case series deal
with the reporting of a series on rare clinical
diseases or syndromes.
In both situations such a report could establish
a ground for better understanding of a rare
but unique case and might even help to determine
a new emerging disease or syndrome. For example
, reporting of a young homosexual man with Kaposi's
sarcoma could eventually help scientists to
determine AIDS as an emerging disease.
Commentaries
Commentaries are those non-research papers which
reflect the viewpoints of their authors regarding
a specific and usually a hot topic issue. Commentaries
could be very informative and might be either
unsolicited or solicited i.e. invited commentaries.
Invited commentaries are usually commissioned
by editors to accompany a research paper in
the same issue.
Narrative reviews
Narrative or traditional reviews are other important
types of non-research paper through which usually
an expert in a given subject, retrieves and
summarizes the findings of different research
papers. The most important limitation of narrative
reviews is that the reviewers usually have not
specified their search strategy and this might
open such reviews into bias.
Although this shortcoming is referred to as
the Achilles' heel of the narrative reviews,
such reviews might still provide readers with
a rich background on a specific issue. Furthermore,
in order to curb this inadequacy of narrative
reviews, scientists have developed some other
robust types of reviews such as systematic reviews
and meta-analyses.
Editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews/film
reviews, case reports/case series, commentaries
and narrative reviews are among the most common
types of non-research papers. Writing and publishing
such non-research papers highlight a critical
and informative environment which is highly necessary
for the advancement of science in different disciplines.
Kittisupamongkol W. Two
sides of the same coin?
Singapore Med J. 2010
Mar;51(3):268.
Rys P, Wladysiuk M, Skrzekowska-Baran
I, Malecki MT. Review
articles, systematic reviews
and meta-analyses: which
can be trusted? Pol Arch
Med Wewn. 2009; 119(3):148-56.
George S, Moreira K. Publishing
non-research papers as
a trainee: a recipe for
beginners. Singapore Med
J. 2009; 50(8):756-8.
Peh WCG, Ng KH. Basic
structure and types of
scientific papers. Singapore
Med J 2008; 49:522-5.
Green BN, Johnson CD,
Adams A. Writing narrative
literature reviews for
peer-reviewed journals:
secrets of the trade.
J Sports Chiropract Rehabil.
2001; 15:5-19.
Gottleib GJ, Rogoz A,
Vogel JV, Friedman-Kien
A, Rywlin AM, Weiner EA,
et al. A preliminary communication
on extensively disseminated
Kaposi's sarcoma in a
young homosexual man.
Am J Dermatopathol.1981;
3:111-4.
|
|
.................................................................................................................
|
|
|